Posts Tagged Climate Change

Andreas Lange (U Hamburg) on Why Fairness Principles Matter to International Climate Change Negotiations

Andreas Lange

Andreas Lange

Why does fairness matter to international climate change negotiations?

To help us answer this question, Andreas Lange, a Professor of Economics from the University of Hamburg joins us on EconomicsNow!. Andreas also holds positions at the Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, University of Maryland, and the National Bureau of Economic Research. Andreas has worked on a number of issues in public and environmental economics, applying theory, lab experiments and applied econometrics to the task. Most recently, Andreas has conducted research on international climate change negotiations and the notion of fairness that each nation or region takes to the negotiations.

Read the paper on which this Podcast is based: Lange, Andreas, Andreas Löschel, Carsten Vogt and Andreas Ziegler, “On the Self-Serving Use of Equity Principles in International Climate Negotiations”, European Economic Review 54, 2010, 359-375.

Or download the podcast here: download (mp3)

, , , ,

No Comments

ABC World Today: EU Climate Advisor ‘astounded’ by Climate Debate in Australia

Via ABC’s the World Today audio program …

Listen to an interview with Jill Duggan, presently working as a carbon pricing expert for the European Commission, emit surprise and awe at the state of the Climate debate in Australia. Several key points are raised and debunked in this interview — won’t Australia be the first to put a price on carbon? (No) Won’t a price on carbon greatly impact on home power bills (No, not in proportion to other increases) Won’t Australia be the first to move to an Emissions Trading Scheme? (No, the EU has a scheme covering over 500 million people that has been operating for many years). Important listening!

Or download the podcast here: download (mp3)

, , , ,

No Comments

Peter Neal (UNSW) on Carbon Capture and Storage

Dr Peter Neal is a research associate at the Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies (otherwise known as the CO2 CRC), and is located in the School of Petroleum Engineering at the University of New South Wales, Sydney. As part of this group, Dr Neal works on modelling the economics of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technologies. In this interview, Dr Neal describes how CCS works, where the technique is being applied current, and what the important economic factors in its use will be. Towards the end of the interview Dr Neal looks ahead to where CCS will be utilised in both the developed and the developing nations of the world.

Or download the podcast here: download (mp3)

, , , ,

No Comments

Matt Chamberlain (CSIRO) on Ocean Modelling and Climate Change

Listen to CSIRO research scientist Dr Matt Chamberlain — he gives an excellent description of how oceans and the climate interact, and how modern scientific methods are used to try and understand this interaction. Matt’s background is in geology and geophysics and he has worked both in the wilds of Antarctica, and in the deserts of America for the University of Arizona and then the Planetary Science Institute. His work focusses on bio-geochemical interactions in the ocean, these are important to understand since the ocean is understood to play a very big role in the carbon cycle, and hence, changes to both the atmosphere above the ocean, and the currents and temperatures in the oceans themselves may have large implications for the way that these cycles operate.

Or download the podcast here: download (mp3)

,

No Comments

Wake Up, Freak Out - then Get a Grip

Or .. `How to present non-linear dynamics to a Linear Generation’


Wake Up, Freak Out - then Get a Grip from Leo Murray on Vimeo.

I’m a big supporter of attempts to bring complex issues to the public in a digestable format, and for this Murray has done a superb work of good here. However, I’m also keen to bring some of the emmotion out of climate change and bring real economic solutions to the table, rather than (say) public disobedience (as it seems Murray would have us undertake from this clip).

The problem of Climate Change is Economic in nature: to quote Nicholas Stern, author of the vital ‘Stern Review’ for the UK, climate change is the biggest example of market failure the world has ever seen. I don’t disagree, and thus, surely it is up to us Economists to provide an answer. Here’s where climate change policy is so important. Murray rightly shows that there are some ‘vested interests’ who may not wish to change the direction of their very large corporate ships, but the reality is, this is not a long-term strategy and they know it. Indeed, many of the large miners (for example) have been thinking about a low-intensity climate future for some time. We, the people, need to support these efforts and encourage our governments to get on their skates. As Murray says, we have little time to ‘fiddle’, Rome isn’t burning yet, but it will.

, , , ,

No Comments

Michael Hanemann on Climate Change Policy

Michael Hanemann is Chancellor’s Professor at the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California at Berkeley. He’s also the Director of the California Climate Change Center. He was in Australia towards the end of 2008 to speak at several universities (including Monash) and to hold discussions with policy makers in the Australian Government. The interview discusses different approaches to climate change policy including what options Australia might take based on experiences internationally, especially in California.

Or download the podcast here: download (mp3)

, , , ,

No Comments

Lessons from the GFC for the GEC

I was recently prompted by James O’Loghlin (host of Sunday’s with James O’Loghlin program on ABC Local radio, Sydney) to think about solutions to both the GFC (Global Financial Crisis) and the GEC (Global Environment Crisis). What he was after, was a discussion of solutions that would solve both problems at the same time .. the old, ‘two birds with one stone’ approach. On the surface of things, this sounds like an impossible task: when one thinks about the hardship that is still building in world economies due to rising unemployment, shouldn’t we be thinking only of fixing up the economy? Shouldn’t we wait until ‘better times’ return for us to then worry about the environment. I mean — the dangers of climate change and its associated dooms-day predictions are important, but surely not that important to rank them above the pressing troubles of the now?

Whilst I’ll write some more on the solutions side of things later, my first thought was not actually ’solutions’ as such, but to do with lessons that we can take from the one to the other.

Read the rest of this entry »

, ,

No Comments

The other climate debate - Background Briefing - ABC

A superb Background Briefing report investigating the forthcoming Renewable Energy Target (presently, 20% of energy production to be greenhouse gas free by 2020) for Australia. Other countries have a similar target, but will Australia be able to deliver? What are the incentives? Are there differences in policy across the states? What are the key forthcoming policy decisions to be made by the Commonwealth. It’s all here.

Or download the podcast here: download (mp3)

Read the transcript at:

, , ,

No Comments

Ross Garnaut on Climate Change - Hack - Triple J

Listen to Garnaut online here:

Or download the podcast here: download (.mp3)

From Triple J’s Hack Program:

Ross Garnaut on 2020 emissions targets

The wait is over Ross Garnaut has finally revealed his target for carbon emission reductions. This is the figure that shows how serious Australia is about dealing with climate change. It’ll have a big impact on things australia’s energy mix and how much you pay for electricity and fuel. So what’s the figure?

Garnaut says 10% reduction by 2020. Business are satisfied while environmental groups were hoping for much more. Garnaut says Australia should be prepared to committ to bigger reductions if there’s international agreement. But he’s skeptical about whether that’ll happen initially.

All this means we’re heading towards an atmosphere of 550 parts per million of carbon dioxide, where bigger cuts would have us at 450 parts per million. But Ross Garnaut says his recommendation is the right mix of economics and science.

+ Listen to Ross Garnaut on 2020 emissions targets (mp3, 3.42mb)

date: 05/09/2008
reporter: Kate O’Toole

, , , ,

No Comments